Debugging
We recomend you use:
- re-frame-10x or refrisk
- with clj-devtools
This page describes techniques for debugging re-frame's event handlers.
Event handlers are quite central to a re-frame app. Only event handlers
can update app-db
to "step" an application "forward" from one state
to the next.
The debug
Interceptor¶
You might wonder: is my event handler making the right changes to app-db
?
During development, the built-in re-frame.core/debug
interceptor can help.
It writes to console.log
:
- the event being processed, for example:
[:attempt-world-record true]
- the changes made to
db
by the handler in processing the event
debug
uses clojure.data/diff
to compare the value of app-db
before and after the handler ran, showing what changed.
clojure.data/diff returns a triple
, the first two entries of which
debug
will display in console.log
(the 3rd says what has not changed and isn't interesting).
The output produced by clojure.data/diff
can take some getting used to,
but you should stick with it -- your effort will be rewarded.
Using debug
¶
So, you will add this Interceptor like this:
(re-frame.core/reg-event-db
:some-id
[re-frame.core/debug] ;; <---- added here!
some-handler-fn)
Except, of course, we need to be more deft - we only want
debug
in development builds. We don't
want the overhead of those clojure.data/diff
calculations in production.
So, this is better:
(re-frame.core/reg-event-db
:some-id
[(when ^boolean goog.DEBUG re-frame.core/debug)] ;; <---- conditional!
some-handler-fn)
goog.DEBUG
is a compile time constant provided by the Google Closure Compiler
.
It will be true
when the build within project.clj
is :optimization :none
and false
otherwise.
Ha! I see a problem, you say. In production, that when
is going to
leave a nil
in the interceptor vector. So the Interceptor vector will be [nil]
.
Surely that's a problem?
Well, actually, no it isn't. re-frame filters out any nil
from interceptor vectors.
Too Much Repetition - Part 1¶
Each event handler has its own interceptor stack.
That might be all very flexible, but does that mean we have to put this debug
business on every single handler? That would be very repetitive.
Yes, you will have to put it on each handler. And, yes, that could be repetitive, unless you take some steps.
One thing you can do is to define standard interceptors at the top of the event.cljs
namespace:
(def standard-interceptors [(when ^boolean goog.DEBUG debug) another-interceptor])
And then, for any one event handler, the code would look like:
(re-frame.core/reg-event-db
:some-id
standard-interceptors ;; <--- use the common definition
some-handler-fn)
or perhaps:
(re-frame.core/reg-event-db
:some-id
[standard-interceptors specific-interceptor] ;; mix with something specific
some-handler-fn)
So that specific-interceptor
could be something required for just this one
event handler, and it can be combined with the standard ones.
Wait on! "I see a problem", you say. standard-interceptors
is a vector
, and it
is within another vector
along side specific-interceptor
- so that's
nested vectors of interceptors!
No problem, re-frame uses flatten
to take out all the nesting - the
result is a simple chain of interceptors. And, as we have discussed,
nil
s are removed.
3. Checking DB Integrity¶
Always have a detailed schema for the data in app-db
!
Why?
First, schemas serve as invaluable documentation. When I come to a new app, the first thing I want to look at is the underlying information model - the schema of the data. I hope it is well commented and I expect it to be rigorous and complete, using Clojure spec or, perhaps, a Prismatic Schema.
Second a good spec allows you to assert the integrity and correctness of
the data in app-db
. Because all the data is in one place, that means you
are asserting the integrity of ALL the data in your app, at one time. All of it.
When should we do this? Ideally, every time a change is made!
Well, it turns out that only event handlers can change the value in
app-db
, so only an event handler could corrupt it. So, we'd like to
recheck the integrity of app-db
immediately
after every event handler has run.
All of it, every time. This allows us to catch any errors very early, easily assigning blame (to the rogue event handler).
Schemas are typically put into db.cljs
(see the todomvc example in the re-frame repo). Here's
an example using Prismatic Schema
(although a more modern choice would be to use Clojure spec):
(ns my.namespace.db
(:require
[schema.core :as s]))
;; As exactly as possible, describe the correct shape of app-db
;; Add a lot of helpful comments. This will be an important resource
;; for someone looking at your code for the first time.
(def schema
{:a {:b s/Str
:c s/Int}
:d [{:e s/Keyword
:f [s/Num]}]})
And a function which will check a db value against that schema:
(defn valid-schema?
"validate the given db, writing any problems to console.error"
[db]
(let [res (s/check schema db)]
(if (some? res)
(.error js/console (str "schema problem: " res)))))
Now, let's organise for valid-schema?
to be run after every handler.
We'll use the built-in after
Interceptor factory function:
(def standard-interceptors [(when ^boolean goog.DEBUG debug)
(when ^boolean goog.DEBUG (after db/valid-schema?))]) ;; <-- new
Now, the instant a handler messes up the structure of app-db
you'll be alerted.
But this overhead won't be there in production.
Too Much Repetition - Part 2¶
Above, we discussed a way of "factoring out" common interceptors into standard-interceptors
.
There's an additional technique we can use to ensure that all event handlers get certain Interceptors:
you write a custom registration function -- a replacement for reg-event-db
-- like this:
(defn my-reg-event-db ;; alternative to reg-event-db
([id handler-fn]
(re-frame.core/reg-event-db id standard-interceptors handler-fn))
([id interceptors handler-fn]
(re-frame.core/reg-event-db
id
[standard-interceptors interceptors]
handler-fn)))
Notice how this registration function inserts our standard interceptors every time.
From now on, you can register your event handlers like this and know that the two standard Interceptors have been inserted:
(my-reg-event-db ;; <-- adds std interceptors automatically
:some-id
some-handler-fn)
What about the -fx variation?¶
Above we created my-reg-event-db
as a new registration function for -db
handlers.
Now, -db
handlers take db
and event
arguments, and return a new db
.
So, they MUST return a new db
value.
But what if we tried to do the same for -fx
handlers which, instead, return
an effects
map which may, or may not, contain a :db
? Our solution would
have to allow for the absence of a new db
value (by doing no validity check, because nothing
was being changed).
(def debug? ^boolean goog.DEBUG)
(def standard-interceptors-fx
[(when debug? debug) ;; as before
(when debug? (after #(if % (db/valid-schema? %)))]) ;; <-- different after
and then:
(defn my-reg-event-fx ;; alternative to reg-event-db
([id handler-fn]
(re-frame.core/reg-event-fx id standard-interceptors-fx handler-fn))
([id interceptors handler-fn]
(re-frame.core/reg-event-fx
id
[standard-interceptors-fx interceptors]
handler-fn)))